http://www.speakmediablog.com/2008/09/social-media-keep-up-or-fall-back.html
It's as if Keen doesn't understand that history and journalism and truth are created by humans and that humans are fallible and that truth itself changes with time. Truth is based in perspective. I'm sure a North American history book's account of a singular event would be quite different than one from Eastern Europe or a history book's account from India. I'm certain that newspaper reports of periods in history from the 1800s in this country would be considered false by today's zeitgeist. So, this "careful aggregation of truth" is itself false.
Keen asserts that in social media, misinformation can spread with frightening speed causing permanent damage to reputations. While it's true that rumors can easily spread through social media, this is certainly not attributable solely the Web.
Keen claims that bloggers are not credible because their anonymity can hide an agenda. Let's set aside the fact that most bloggers do identify themselves and their backgrounds.
Command....
It talks about the sometimes media gave wrong information to the world and it is really frightful for the people. I agree for that because some blogger gave information and people who read that and came to believe and happen a lot of problems. So as a writer has to be very careful and as a reader has to be very critical in reading.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_social_networking_websitesTo Do list:
i) Put up IT educational news at least 14 times [any news about modern tech. news]
ii) 10 Abstracts related to the technology for teaching-&-learning
iii) To read 2 Portfolio Handbooks before submitting the individual blog
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment